Reformed thought vs PCUSA - The Gospel according to Oprah

• The Gospel according to Oprah
• Jesus, the Bible and Homosexuality

Now I don't think that Oprah is the Anti-Christ nor are the homosexual activist in the PCUSA, but I do think that they are an anti-Christ. These are advocating a different Gospel than the one that Jesus the Christ taught and died for.

They are advocating one in which you do it yourself, now many homosexuals truly feel attracted to people of their own gender, this is largely from their environment, but this is no different than my wife being attracted to another man. That is called normal, what becomes wrong is to act or dwell on those emotions. Homosexuals only sin when they act on their emotions.

Now Oprah is just plain old "do it your self religion" and the the homosexual is just make Christianity nothing. The interesting part of this situation is that the PCUSA publishing is advocating both. When reading the studies they clearly believe that both Oprah is a spiritual person upon which we should look to for theology(does that make here a minister of sorts - I guess she will have to cut out her liberal political advocacy, well they get away with it anyway) and the Homosexual agenda. Both are Trojans trying to change the way the church thinks clearly an indication of the situation of the PCUSA.

The homosexual study clearly says people are allowed to disagree, but then says

Likewise, historical documentation should be accepted and not debated. Rogers is a recognized scholar and has done painstaking research. ....Jack Rogers shares his personal journey as a Christian, scholar, and minister in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). While he did not seek to be involved in advocating ordination of people who are homosexual, through his experiences and study he has come to this position.

So what they are saying really is disagree all you want but "we have the evidence that we are right and you can't challenge its accuracy" Pretty week arguments and what it really means is that they know in the back of their minds that they are biased(even though like all good liberals they think they are not) and try to suppress any real debate. What it really means is they don't like the idea of SIN, and the penalty for it.


So what do they mean when they say
Building on the Reformed tradition
I think they mean ripping the whole darn thing out and starting from a different road. A yellow brick road that leads to neverland, I think.

Maybe what they mean is we don't think that the reformers meant what you think it meant, what they really meant was.........
Now thats a truly relevant way to understand a modern day PCUSA. Maybe the PC means Politically Correct.